Dear experts,
is there a standard way of assigning a human task to multiple persons, where every person has to complete the task?
Regards,
Markus
Dear experts,
is there a standard way of assigning a human task to multiple persons, where every person has to complete the task?
Regards,
Markus
Dear all,
we have an issue here where UWL in workflow as soon as it goes to approval, in the backend it goes to RESERVED status for the same user(userA). Also workflow is going to only user(userA) and this userA is getting error message in his portal after clicking the UWL saying " This workitem has already being in use by userA" which is the same user.
Reserved status is happening as soon as user clicks the UWL in portal. Can anyone kindly help me on why this is happening as we have many cases like this?
You can see the attachment with screenshots from portal end. Sorry it’s in Portuguese. You can see 16:36:22 it is in Encerr(Initiated) and when it goes to first level approval, it is automatically changing to Reservado(RESERVED) status at 16:36:30
Hi Everyone,
We have updated a system with a new company code and corresponding new plants for profit center update. Now, they want the workflow handling of INVOIC, DESADV and ORDRSP to still be maintained. There is an existing workflow for error handling on these messages for the old company code and plants. The workflow items are sent to certain positions maintained in PPOM. Now, I am requested to create new positions that will receive the notifications for errors on incoming invoices, order responses and dispatch advices for the new company code/plants. Creating new positions and assigning agents to them is quite easy but my problem is where to specify the information about the company code and plants. For the existing positions, only the Basic data tab is maintained where only an abrreviation of the position and its definition need to be entered.
Right now, the workflow items for the new company code and plants are directed to a position that already exists in PPOM before the project. So how can I have the workflow items be directed to a new position that I will create?
I hope someone can provide an answer to this. Thanks!
Hello,
Can you please provide your input whether we should apply below mentioned SAP Notes in Production system.
1.SAP Note-0001925195
Symptom-
In the context of event generation for system and user status, the system no longer generates the event)
2. SAP Note-0001946643
Sympton-
The following runtime error occurs in your system:
Category ABAP Programming Error
Runtime Errors OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED_NO
Except. CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL
ABAP Program CL_SWF_RUN_WIM_LOCAL==========CP
Application Component BC-BMT-WFM
The problem occurs only if you use an API to start a new work item within the execution of another work item. Additionally, you use an ABAP OO methods in the work item task.
3. SAP Note-0001935328
Symptom-
A runtime error occurs when you call the workflow outbox or a corresponding API.
Runtime error EXPORT_NO_SHARED_MEMORY
Exception CX_SY_EXPORT_NO_SHARED_MEMORY
The short text of the runtime error tells you that the EXPORT data cluster is too large for the SHARED MEMORY. The termination occurs in the class CL_SWF_RUN_OUTBOX_PERSISTENCE
I would appreciate quick response with reasons on same.
Regards,
Sudeesh Soni
Hi All,
In Offline Workflow Approval Scenarios where the work items are sent to outlook of non sap users inbox through workitem exit of the respective workflow item. Based on the user reply from outlook email(either approve or reject) which sends an auto reply to Offline user . We configure an inbound exit class and assign the same in the SMICM transaction. Based on the code written using SAP_WAPI function modules in inbound class exit offline user gets the user approval result and performs the action in SAP.
My question now Is how can we use this inbound exit class for all the steps of a workflow.
For ex: In a workflow I have a decision step followed by an activity step. First I will write the work item exit for the user decision step and inbound exit code for the user decision step and offline user executed the user decision step with approve action.
followed by that I have an activity step for that I will code a work item exit for that activity level but how can I user the same inbound exit class for the activity step as well .
Quick reply would be of great help for me.
With Best Regards,
Veni
Hi,
I am working SAP portfolio and project management workflow.
Requirement: Trigger workflow when Portfolio Execution Decision Point status changes,
We have to send two email notifications as part of the requirement;
We can trigger the workflow using event DECISION_POINT_STATUS_CHG in Class CL_RPM_DECISION. My question is how should design the pop-up and incorporate the Pop-up and cproject link in first notification email sent to user SAP Inbox.
Please let me know if you need more details.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Singh
Hello Experts,
My client wants the Personal subarea text in UWL task list under sender column.
I tried to change the workitem text but the expression is too long thats why it is not accepting under subject column.
I'm attaching the screen shot for better understanding.
Please suggest me some way to achieve this.
Thanks & Regards,
Prajyot.D
Hi Experts :
I have a dialog workitem that has 'Confirm end of Processing' check box enabled and hence the agent can either click on the 'Complete Workitem' or 'Cancel' buttons after he has double clicked the workitem in his inbox. My question now is can we add custom buttons to this Confirm end of Processing screen and have a third button to perform a specific scenario in the workflow.
Kindly throw light on this please,thanks.
Regards,
Chaitanya
Hi Experts,
I have a custom Workflow template that needs some changes.
- Change in the BO method code of an existing standard task of this template
- Addition of elements in the main container of this template
- Changing the container bindings for email steps / edit email
How should I go about doing these changes, please advise
- Once I open the template in SWDD, is it advisable to goto Menu Workflow->Generate Version or directly edit the template and save.
Which is the best practice / difference it makes ?
- Any specific order that I need to follow while changing the different template components
- While transporting the TR for workflow templates, what should be taken care of ?
In Production system, version is 0003 and in Dev it is 0004, both with the same dates.
Also pls provide any link/document that can guide on the workflow change process, it would be great.
Thanks in advance for your time and inputs !
Regards,
Mirza.
Hi All,
I want to know how custom workflow triggeres without WAPI function module.
What exacltly i want to know is besides WAPI function module/Event is there any way of triggering workflow.
Thanks
Sanjay.
HI all,
I have run the programme RSWUWFML2 by creating variant and mentioned in job(sm36) for lotus integration.
but thing is its taking almost 30 to 40 minutes to get workitem text into lotus inbox.
and the workitem text is not fully showing..its taking up to 50 characters only in lotus inbox.
kindly let me know the solutions for the above questions.
i haven't mentioned the task ids in variant.....
Please let me know.
ramesh
Dear experts,
is there a standard way of assigning a human task to multiple persons, where every person has to complete the task?
Regards,
Markus
Hello Experts,
When Purchase order final release is cancelled SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED event does not trigger but when other release is cancelled SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED event is triggered.
This SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED event triggers event if Event Linkage with Change Pointer is not defined in SWEC.
Could someone please tell me why SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED event is not triggered in final release cancelled and triggers for rest of the release cancelled.
Please help me in this.
Thanks in Advance..!!
Hi Experts,
I have devleope a workflow; which has total 3 steps. I want to set back the control to get approvers (just like goto statement) after step "chamber of commerce display) again and again until my condition is met. I don't want to use a loop, because i am selecting the approver one by one in get_approver step.
It is possible in workflows that we have goto statement which send back the control to any step which is our requirement
An image is attached for your reference.
Regards,
--
Sohail
Hi all,
I have the following requirement
Currently, requisitioner receives workflow email notification each time the PR has been released. If a PR has 3 approvers, the requisitioner receives 3 identical emails. The problem is that from the email alone, the requisitioner does not know if the PR has been fully released or not. After the first email, requisitioner may try to create the PO when in fact the PR is not fully approved yet.
The case here is when the requisition is created, the mail is sent to first approver to release the requisition and when the first approver releases, mail is sent to next approver and so till all the approvers approve, finally after all the approvals it is sent to requisitioner.
For this I have created an activity GET PR status where i am checking the condition based on release indicator.
When the release indicator is '2' then the final notification is sent to the requisitioner.
The process is working fine in dev system. When there are three approvers and all the approvers have same mail Id when i create the requisition and release manually in me55, I am able to see the mail in sost. This is actually done after running the batch program. But when the approvers have different mail Id's im able to see in swia but not in sost.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Hello Experts,
I have copied the standard workflow WS20000075 for PO approval on Release step.
the copied workflow works fine in sandbox system, but in the test system I get an error saying 'import container contains errors (are any obligatory elements missing?)' I guess 'ReleaseCode' is not getting passed to the Workflow from the PO creation T-code.
I went thru few SCN post, did check all the Linkages as said, everything seems to be ok. but still cannot trigger the workflow.
need guidance as to where I may be going wrong.
Regards,
Jibran
Hi All,
My requirement is to stop workflow from generating W2 and keep W1 in READY state when user clicks on back button. For eg.
Workflow is triggered and email is sent to user A. workitem W1 is created in READY state.
User A opens workitem W1 and does not take any action and clickson BACK Button.
This again generated another workitem W2 in ready state and W1 now shows COMPLETED state.
We have identified the condition to know when user clicks on back button: which is WE CHECK next state.
If its Blank, then it is this condition.
This is required since we also have another workflow for deadline monitoring which generates new deadline notification when user clicks on back button.
Please give suggestions for this requirement.
I have already tried manually changing status from COMPLETED TO READY via program exit event AFTER_EXECUTION but it dumps (obviously)
I am attaching the screen shot of the workflow template.
HI,
I am trying to see if i can bring a Workflow Process for Transaction F-03 (restricting the Users and make it go through an Approval Process to clear more than say $100).. I understood that i would need to have the Parking Functionality for this but i do not seem to find a way to gring this Parking or the ability to hold the documents from Posting .
Any suggestions /tips would certainly help.
Thanks
Ram
Hi guys,
I have the following case:
There is a referenced sub process in my process flow, configured with looping. Hence several parallel tasks should be started.The idea is to continue the main process flow only if all parallel tasks have been approved by their processors or cancel all tasks with status "In progress" if one of the processors cancel his task.
I need some ideas for how to achieve that.
What I have tried so far is to check the user action within the referenced sub process and if it is reject I am exiting the sub process through a critical escalation end set to terminating. I was expecting that that the loop will be broken, all pending tasks in UWL will be cancelled and the process flow will continue, but it does not do this. What happens is that the process flow continues, but the created parallel tasks are left in the UWL with status "In Progress".
I will really appreciate your ideas on how I can achieve the above.
Thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Mariya Stancheva