Hello all,
I have created a new, very simple, workflow. I've attached the screen print of that workflow to this discussion.
This workflow is started by a report that updates a table and triggers an event. This workflow uses the records in the table and executes a SAP function module to create statistical key figures. Using the same input file to the report in both QAC and development: development works as expected, QAC does not update the task container, and consequently the workflow container, so the decision step, that follows the dialogue step, has a blank value in the field that is used to determine which path to take.
I'm having the same problem I was previously having when I am modifying an existing workflow. The task container is not getting updated from the method container in QAC. I did not have this problem in the development environment.
I can see that the task to the method binding is active.
I can see that the method to the task binding his active.
I can see that the task to the workflow container binding is active.
All of the bindings setting that I have checked in development and QAC are identical. The only issue that I can see is that the bindings for both the task to the method and the method to the task container contain nonexistent container fields, in both development and QAC. I will make changes in development and then transport into QAC.
But I don't think that is what is causing the problem because in development, even with those non-existing fields in the bindings, the task container is being updated correctly so the following decision step in the workflow is taking the right path, in development, but not in QAC.
Using Karri's sage advice I received from an earlier posting did not solve my problem.
>>> Open the task with PFTC. Click the "Binding Object Method" button (button with two green boxes in the bottom & left side of the screen). Does the binding from method to task look correct (or does it even exist)? Are you really returning the value from the method to the task? <<<
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Thanks
Bruce
Message was edited by: Bruce Tjosvold